Cocoon Finger Puppets: Fostering Creativity and Innovative Teaching Through a Participatory Pedagogical Method
January 2024, Vol. 2, No. 1, Issue
Author(s)
Arun Mascarenhas (IDC School of Design, IIT Bombay, Powai 400076)
Suvidha P (AAVNI Centre for Advanced Studies and Research in Tribal Art, Culture, and Empowerment, Bengaluru, India)
Abstract
Fostering creativity has been the main emphasis in 21st-century educational discourses, leading to engaging innovative teaching approaches and methods. More often, materials used in such activities are unsustainable and offer limited creative manoeuvring possibilities. Considering the size and scale of educational activity worldwide, it would become a significant concern. Puppetry proved efficient in improving communication, narrating concepts, and helping learning outcomes in education. Finger Puppets are relatively modern and easy to make among various puppetry forms, which offers scope for participatory pedagogy. In earlier attempts, silkworm cocoons have been used in handicrafts, value-added products, and limited teaching explorations. The sericulture industry extracts only ~18-23 % of silk filament wrapped around each cocoon, leaving the inner shell (~80%) unutilized, which unwraps an enormous opportunity to explore this unique natural material for its qualities and abundance. The article explores the potential of ‘Silkworm Cocoons’ as the primary material for creating finger puppets to aid the teaching process at the preschoolstage. The insights gained in the study and feedback from educators motivated us to design various character options using a locally available cocoon breed, Bombyx mori L., as a primary resource, envisioning a novel approach to pedagogy. That included identifying the gap, demonstrating the creative possibility of Cocoon Finger Puppets (CFP), and piloting a study to check feasibility at the foundational stage. The iterative design process exposed infinite possibilities that could aid effective pedagogy across educational stages, offering staggered complexity of making and performing. Hence, we propose CFP, a novel ‘material-centric’ ‘make-and-learn’ framework, as a ‘participatory pedagogical method.’ That is creative, appropriate, nature-friendly, and simple to implement in schools at various stages identified in NEP2020, supporting global Sustainable Development Goals.
Keywords
Creativity, Innovation, Make and Learn, Method, Education, SDGs
DOI :
Copyright & Licence
Authors publishing in JAARD retain copyright in their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. Published articles are made available under the Creative Commons licence specified by the journal. Current licence: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Pages : 1-18
Citation
Mascarenhas, A., & Suvidha, P. (2024). Cocoon Finger Puppets: Fostering Creativity and Innovative Teaching Through a Participatory Pedagogical Method. International Journal of Arts Architecture & Design, 2(1), 1-18. doi.org/10.62030/
References
Ahlcrona, M. F. (2012). The puppet’s communicative potential as a mediating tool in preschool education. *International Journal of Early Childhood, 44*(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13158-012-0060-3
Aldiss, S., Horstman, M., O’Leary, C., Richardson, A., & Gibson, F. (2009, March). What is important to young children who have cancer while in hospital? *Child: Care, Health and Development, 23*(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1099-0860.2008.00162.X
Aravind, M. A., Dinesh, N. S., Rao, N., & Charan, P. (2015, January). *Automated Puppetry—Robo-Puppet*. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_49
Asher, R. (2009, May). Radical puppets and the language of art. *Art Education, 62*(3), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519014
Babu, N. K. (2020, April). Supplementary elements of entertainment in leather shadow puppeteering of Andhra Pradesh. *PARIPEX—Indian Journal of Research, 9*(4), 1991. https://doi.org/10.36106/paripex
Bascom, W. R. (1954). Four functions of folklore. *Journal of American Folklore, 67*(266), 333–349. https://doi.org/10.2307/536411
Basham, A. L. (n.d.). *The wonder that was India*. Grove Press. https://www.scirp.org/%28S%28vtj3fa45qm1ean45vvffcz55%29%29/reference/referencespapers.aspx?referenceid=1670386
Bernier, M., & O’Hare, J. (2005). *Puppetry in education and therapy: Unlocking doors to the mind and heart*.
Brandon, J. R. (1967). *Theatre in Southeast Asia*. Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674875876
Bredikyte, M. (2000, August). *Dialogical drama with puppets and children’s creation of sense*.
Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). Assessing internal working models of the attachment relationship: An attachment story completion task for 3-year-olds. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), *Attachment in the preschool years: Theory, research, and intervention* (pp. 273–308). University of Chicago Press.
Chattopadhyay, A. (2017). Puppetry as a form of mass communication: Indian perspective. *Community & Communication, 5*, 2456–9011.
Clark, A., McQuail, S., & Moss, P. (2003). *Exploring the field of listening to and consulting with young children*.
Cole, M., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2007). Vygotsky and culture. In *The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky* (pp. 193–211). https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.009
Delanty, G. (2009). *Community* (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203877050
Dunst, C. J. (2012). Effects of puppetry on elementary students’ knowledge of and attitudes toward individuals with disabilities. *International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4*(3), 451–457. https://www.iejee.com
Finger puppet. (n.d.). In *Wikipedia*. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finger_puppet
Foley, K., & Pudumjee, D. (2013). India. In *World Encyclopedia of Puppetry Arts*. https://wepa.unima.org/en/india/
Gallacher, L. A., & Gallagher, M. (2008). Methodological immaturity in childhood research?: Thinking through ‘participatory methods’. *Childhood, 15*(4), 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672
Hedges, H., & Cullen, J. (2012). Participatory learning theories: A framework for early childhood pedagogy. *Early Child Development and Care, 182*(7), 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2011.597504
Howells, J. G., & Townsend, D. (1954, May). Puppetry as a medium for play diagnosis. *Occupational Therapy: The Official Journal of the Association of Occupational Therapists, 17*(2), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802265401700201
Iyer, K. E. (1960). Puppet shows in South India. In S. Benegal (Ed.), *Puppet theatre around the world* (pp. 96–99). Bharatiya Natya Sangh.
Jarovtseva, I. (n.d.). Sergei Obraztsov. *World Encyclopedia of Puppetry Arts*. https://wepa.unima.org/en/sergei-obraztsov/
Keene, D., & Kaneko, H. (1974). *Bunraku: The art of the Japanese puppet theatre*.
Khan, F., Irfan, M., & Sharma, H. (2020). Performing arts as a domain of intangible cultural heritage with special reference to Indian folk theatre. https://doi.org/10.24327/ijrsr.2021.1202.5823
Kröger, T., & Nupponen, A.-M. (2019). Puppet as a pedagogical tool: A literature review. *International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11*, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019450797
Kurt, A., & Seval, M. (2021). The effect of finger puppets on postoperative pain in children: A randomized controlled trial. *Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 11*, 113–118. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.713672
Littlepage, E. L. (2006). *Puppets with a purpose: Folk arts, cultural communication, and development in India*.
Marshall, J. (2014). Transdisciplinarity and art integration: Toward a new understanding of art-based learning across the curriculum. *Studies in Art Education, 55*(2), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2014.11518922
Mascarenhas, A., & Suvidha, P. (n.d.). *Silk cocoon handicrafts—Best out of silk waste*. D’source. https://www.dsource.in/resource/silk-cocoon-handicrafts
Measelle, J. R., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (1998). Assessing young children’s views of their academic, social, and emotional lives: An evaluation of the Self-Perception Scales of the Berkeley Puppet Interview. *Child Development, 69*(6), 1556–1576. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132132
Mehrotra, S., Khunyakari, R., Natarajan, C., & Chunawala, S. (2009). Collaborative learning in technology education: D&T unit on puppetry in different Indian socio-cultural contexts. *International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19*(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10798-007-9037-1
NCERT. (2009, September). *Eighth All India School Education Survey*.
NCERT. (n.d.). *Kala Utsav*. https://kalautsav.ncert.gov.in/
Orr, I. C. (1974). Puppet theatre in Asia. *Asian Folklore Studies, 33*(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/1177504
Patton, T. (2023, April 14). What is creativity in education? *The Education Hub*. https://theeducationhub.org.nz/what-is-creativity-in-education/
Prihatin, J., Suwartini, S., Anggraeni, S., Aini, K., & Firmansyah, R. (2018, February). Biology learning based on brain-based learning using cocoon finger puppet. *BIOEDUKASI, 15*(2), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.19184/BIOEDU.V15I2.6938
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? *Childhood, 9*(3), 321–341.
Reid Searl, K., et al. (2014). Little people, big lessons: An innovative strategy to develop interpersonal skills in undergraduate nursing students. *Nurse Education Today, 34*(9), 1201–1206. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEDT.2014.04.004
Remer, R., & Tzuriel, D. (2015, March). ‘I teach better with the puppet’—Use of puppet as a mediating tool in kindergarten education: An evaluation. *American Journal of Educational Research, 3*(3), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.12691/EDUCATION-3-3-15
Riyani, I. (2019, April). Utilizing storytelling technique using finger puppet in teaching vocabulary mastery to young learners. *Jurnal JOEPALLT (Journal of English Pedagogy, Linguistics, Literature, and Teaching), 7*(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/JJ.V7I1.539
Romanski, N. M. (2019). Reigniting the transformative power of puppets through narrative pedagogy, contemporary art, and transdisciplinary approaches in art education. *Art Education, 72*(4), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2019.1602496
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. *Creativity Research Journal, 24*(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Sericulture in India. (n.d.). *Vikaspedia*. https://vikaspedia.in/agriculture/farm-enterprises/sericulture/sericulture-in-india
Shah, A., & Joshi, U. (1992). *Puppetry and folk dramas for non-formal education* (p. 174).
Sparapani, V. de C., et al. (2013, December). The use of puppets as a strategy for communicating with children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. *Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 4*(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.5430/JNEP.V4N2P186
Synovitz, L. B. (1999). Using puppetry in a coordinated school health program. *Journal of School Health, 69*(4), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1746-1561.1999.TB0
Tillis, S. (1992). *Toward an aesthetics of the puppet: Puppetry as a theatrical art*. Contributions in Drama and Theatre Studies.
Turner, V. (1974). *Symbolic action in human society*. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv75d7df
UNIMA. (n.d.). *World Encyclopedia of Puppetry Arts*. https://wepa.unima.org/en/alphabetic/
Violette, M., & March, R. (n.d.). Finger puppet. *World Encyclopedia of Puppetry Arts*. https://wepa.unima.org/en/finger-puppet/
Vygotsky, L. S. (2012). *Thought and language*. MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L., & Cole, M. (1978). *Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes*. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=RxjjUefze_oC
Walsh, D. (2005). *Developmental theory and early childhood education*. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=en&lr=&id=n0NEBgAAQBAJ