Introducing the Effort-Benefit Framework: A Mimamsa-Inspired Approach to Defining Effective Learning Outcomes
July 2025, Vol. 3, No. 2, Issue
Author(s)
Dr. Sachin Datt (Sushant University, Gurgaon, India)
Abstract
Bloom’s taxonomy has been one of the most prevailing frameworks for writing the Learning outcomes (LO) of any educational program. However, this taxonomy was originally created to define Cognitive Learning outcomes and that is problematic for creative programs like design. The limitations of the taxonomy inspired us to search for alternate approaches for defining learning outcomes for design education.
This paper introduces the Effort-Benefit (E-B) Framework, a novel approach to defining learning outcomes inspired by the action-oriented principles of the Mimamsa school of Indian philosophy. The E-B Framework focuses on establishing explicit connections between specific learning efforts and their associated cognitive and affective benefits. To evaluate the framework’s effectiveness, a comparative study was conducted with 24 design students and faculty members. Participants were given online forms in which they had to select their preference between two types of learning outcome statements, namely statements following Bloom’s taxonomy and those following the E-B framework.
The results reveal a significant preference towards learning outcome statements based on the proposed E-B Framework as against the statements using Bloom’s taxonomy. 78% of participants favored the E-B framework statements of learning outcomes in terms of being more meaningful to perceive, over the Bloom’s Taxonomy alternative. The findings highlight the need for better alternatives to Bloom’s taxonomy for defining learning outcomes in design education. An extension of the research will need to validate the framework across diverse disciplines and educational contexts. Its impact on learner engagement and performance is further required to be investigated.
Keywords
Design Education, Learning Outcomes, Effort and Benefit, Mimamsa Philosophy, Bloom’s Taxonomy
DOI :
Copyright & Licence
Authors publishing in JAARD retain copyright in their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. Published articles are made available under the Creative Commons licence specified by the journal. Current licence: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).
Pages : 20-29
Citation
Datt, S. (2025). Introducing the Effort-Benefit Framework: A Mimamsa-inspired approach to defining effective learning outcomes. International Journal of Arts Architecture & Design, 3(2), 20–29. doi.org/10.62030/2025Julypaper2
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). *Teaching for quality learning at university* (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). *Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain.* David McKay Company.
Bertucio, B. (2017). The Cartesian heritage of Bloom’s taxonomy. *Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36*(4), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9533-4
Chari, C. T. K. (1978). *Fundamentals of Visistadvaita Vedanta: A study based on Vedanta Desika’s Tattva-mukta-kalapa.* Motilal Banarsidass.
Cross, N. (2006). *Designerly ways of knowing.* Springer.
Datt, S. (2021). Theoretical basis for evolving taxonomy of the affective domain. *Journal of Educational Psychology, 15*(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.15.2.1802
Freschi, E., Ollett, A., & Pascucci, M. (2019). Duty and sacrifice: A logical analysis of the Mīmāṃsā theory of Vedic injunctions. *History and Philosophy of Logic.* https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2019.1615366
Francavilla, J. (2006). The principles of Mimamsa and the Vedic injunction. *Journal of Indian Philosophy, 34*(3), 255–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-005-7142-4
Furst, E. J. (1981). Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives for the cognitive domain: Philosophical and educational issues. *Review of Educational Research, 51*(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543051004441
Jha, G. (1942). *Purva Mimamsa in its sources.* Benares Hindu University Press.
Kennedy, D., Hyland, A., & Ryan, N. (2007). Writing and using learning outcomes: A practical guide. In E. Froment, J. Kohler, L. Purser, & L. Wilson (Eds.), *EUA Bologna handbook: Making Bologna work* (C 3.4-1, pp. 1–30). Raabe Verlag.
Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. *Theory into Practice, 41*(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
Kumar, R. (2000). The concept of Adrishta in Purva Mimamsa. *Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 27*(4), 497–506.
Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). *Design expertise.* Architectural Press.
Ormell, C. P. (1974). Bloom’s taxonomy and the objectives of education. *Educational Research, 17*(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188740170101
Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. *Design Studies, 20*(2), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00029-5
Spady, W. G. (1994). *Outcome-based education: Critical issues and answers.* American Association of School Administrators.
Verpoorten, J. (1987). *Mimamsa literature.* Otto Harrassowitz.